In the same way, i don't think you can think "CIA" when looking at the murder of JFK.
And because of the way trust works, i don't see how a conspiracy of more than 6 people directly involved work (just look at history, the "French connection" but also the testimonies of captured bank busters and criminal groups). The issue with what's called "conspiracy theories" is that they involve a lot of different people being on the payroll. Or current powerfull politicians and businessmen. It's easier for them to keep quiet if only one was involved, and if two were, they only have to trust each other, so the information will probably never get out.Īnd in the second case, anyone rich and powerfull could have done it. The second case is much more probable imho, and only demanded the intervention of one, maybe two people. So i'd say at least 8 people were necessary, but closer to 20 if you count the administrative demand (putting the right guardians and the right legists at the right timing etc) If the first case is true, i can't imagine this had gone quietly, and that the legists didn't see a thing. But in this very case, there is two theories: on that someone killed him, the other that he was given the means to kill himself.
0 kommentar(er)
